<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Linkadage Blog &#187; Google News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.linkadage.com/blog/category/google-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.linkadage.com/blog</link>
	<description>SEO and Text Link discussion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 04:31:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Garbage Backlinks Rule</title>
		<link>http://www.linkadage.com/blog/2007/09/garbage-links/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkadage.com/blog/2007/09/garbage-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 18:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LinkAdage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Text Link Ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkadage.com/blog/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometime’s Google makes me want to bang my head against a wall.  I am always preaching to link buyers to buy natural looking relevant links.  Ideally, the best, most safe and powerful links are links in natural content.  Buy quality links and you will be rewarded.
Now, all of a sudden the massive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometime’s Google makes me want to bang my head against a wall.  I am always preaching to link buyers to buy natural looking relevant links.  Ideally, the best, most safe and powerful links are links in natural content.  Buy quality links and you will be rewarded.</p>
<p>Now, all of a sudden the massive garbage backlink trick seems to be working better than ever in Google.  This is kind of ironic, given Google’s tough talk about paid link advertising over the past few months.<span id="more-60"></span></p>
<p>I am seeing sites ranking top 5 with 95% spam links, many of which are Russian or Chinese guest book and blog spam.  This is the type of paid linking that gives the link selling industry a bad name.</p>
<p>On a personal level, we will be exhibiting at the WebMasterWorld tradeshow in December, so to get some idea’s for SWAG, I Google searched on the phrase ‘promotional items’.  The number one site was one that reeked of poor quality &#8211; <a href="http://www.blossompromotions.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">blossompromotions.com/</a>   So I checked their backlinks in Yahoo and could not believe the garbage links that are boosting this site to #1. Here is a look at their backlinks: <a href="http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=linkdomain%3Ablossompromotions.com+-site%3Ablossompromotions.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=linkdomain%3Ablossompromotions.com+-site%3Ablossompromotions.com </a></p>
<p>This may sound weird coming from LinkAdage, but I hope that Google gets better at spotting garbage backlinks or the SERPs will become quite a mess as sites with nothing to lose load up on crap links and the quality sites will get lost in the shuffle because they are spending their time getting relevant links on great websites.  I am all for quality, on-target paid link advertising, but the garbage links helping garbage websites reach the top of the SERPs is a bit over the top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkadage.com/blog/2007/09/garbage-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Split Website PR</title>
		<link>http://www.linkadage.com/blog/2007/01/split-website-pr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkadage.com/blog/2007/01/split-website-pr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2007 16:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LinkAdage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkadage.com/wordpress/?p=45</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If your website has changed PR in the last 4 months or so, you will notice that some data centers will reflect your former PR. This does not mean a website&#8217;s PR is any worse than a site that has the same PR across all data centers, it just means that the site&#8217;s PR has [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If your website has changed PR in the last 4 months or so, you will notice that some data centers will reflect your former PR. This does not mean a website&#8217;s PR is any worse than a site that has the same PR across all data centers, it just means that the site&#8217;s PR has change recently.</p>
<p>Matt Cutts from Google has stated that some of the older data centers did not get updated PR because of infrastructure issues. When he first mentioned this at the November Pub Con, he also said that all DCs would be in sync early this year. As of today, we still have split PR.</p>
<p>So if you buy a link on a PR 7 and notice that some DCs on the Metrics Checker are showing something different, don&#8217;t worry, the PR reflected by the majority of the DCs is the â€œrealâ€ toolbar PR of the website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkadage.com/blog/2007/01/split-website-pr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PR update in progress</title>
		<link>http://www.linkadage.com/blog/2006/10/pr-update-in-progress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkadage.com/blog/2006/10/pr-update-in-progress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LinkAdage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkadage.com/wordpress/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In case you have not noticed, Google is in the middle of a PR and back-link update. Unlike most updates, this one is spreading slowly across Googleâ€™s many datacenters and seems to be only 75% finished. Many sites with PR updates going on still have multiple Pagerank numbers for the same page on different datacenters. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In case you have not noticed, Google is in the middle of a PR and back-link update. Unlike most updates, this one is spreading slowly across Googleâ€™s many datacenters and seems to be only 75% finished. Many sites with PR updates going on still have multiple Pagerank numbers for the same page on different datacenters. Apparently, the lagging data centers are using a slightly older infrastructure for a few query types that are off the beaten path a bit (info:, link:, toolbar PR queries, etc.).</p>
<p>While it has been extremely busy lately, if you can get on the <a href="http://www.linkadage.com/linkadage-info/metrics_checker.htm">LinkAdage Metrics Checker</a> you can see what direction your site may be moving. If you are in the middle of buying, selling or trading links, you may want to pay close attention to PR if you are one of the PR obsessed.</p>
<p>It is worth noting, that the SERP changes reflected in this PR update took place about a month ago, this update is only Google giving us their latest snapshot of website PR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkadage.com/blog/2006/10/pr-update-in-progress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New SERPs on the way</title>
		<link>http://www.linkadage.com/blog/2006/01/new-serps-on-the-way/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkadage.com/blog/2006/01/new-serps-on-the-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 16:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LinkAdage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkadage.com/wordpress/?p=31</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has been busy testing new SERPs that address the www.mysite.com / mysite.com duplication content issues that have negatively affected may websites. Occasionally, over the past week, these results have appeared on the default Google data centers.
If you would like to sneak a look at where your site may appear you can go to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has been busy testing new SERPs that address the www.mysite.com / mysite.com duplication content issues that have negatively affected may websites. Occasionally, over the past week, these results have appeared on the default Google data centers.</p>
<p>If you would like to sneak a look at where your site may appear you can go to the Google test data center at <a href="http://66.249.93.104/" rel="nofollow">http://66.249.93.104/</a>. Remember, these are test SERPs and there could be significant changes before they go live. It is best to view them to see the direction your site is going, not where it will eventually end up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkadage.com/blog/2006/01/new-serps-on-the-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where Did Your Website Go?</title>
		<link>http://www.linkadage.com/blog/2005/10/where-did-your-website-go/</link>
		<comments>http://www.linkadage.com/blog/2005/10/where-did-your-website-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 16:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>LinkAdage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO Tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.linkadage.com/wordpress/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jagger Update Revisited
Thousands of established sites were recently re-sandboxed during the latest    Google updated dubbed “Update Jagger”. Many of the dropped sites    were top-10 in Google for their money keywords for years, now they are no where    to be found. SEOs and webmasters are scratching their [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Jagger Update Revisited</h3>
<p>Thousands of established sites were recently re-sandboxed during the latest    Google updated dubbed “Update Jagger”. Many of the dropped sites    were top-10 in Google for their money keywords for years, now they are no where    to be found. SEOs and webmasters are scratching their collective heads wondering    what’s going on.</p>
<p>LinkAdage believes the re-sandboxing of a website can be the result of many    factors. You will need to look at your website and SEO efforts and try to figure    out what factor caused your site to get dropped into the Google sandbox and    out of the public eye.</p>
<p>Google is making a dedicated effort to list only the most dynamic, popular,    authoritative sites possible in the top 10 for highly competitive keywords.    So if you have a small site that hasn’t change much, is not sticky (return    visits), and your backlink patterns are unnatural, you’re probably wondering    what happened to your website’s rankings.</p>
<h3>Here are a few of the long time basic tactics that should be avoided:</h3>
<p id="content">&nbsp;</p>
<li>Participation in Reciprocal Link Clubs or Reciprocal Link Pyramid Schemes</li>
<li>Stagnant Content</li>
<li>Too many links from multi-category article websites that are built for selling    AdSense and text links ads.</li>
<li>Black Hat SEO – hidden text, hidden links, sneaky redirects etc…</li>
<li>No buzz – Google your site’s name – How many results? Your    site’s name should come up at least 20,000 times. People discuss authority    sites.<br />
The new twist to the Jagger update is Google has turned up things a notch      and it now looks, as detailed in Google’s <a href="http://www.linkadage.com/linkadage-info/google_patent.htm">Search      Engine 25 Patent</a>, that they are beginning to use Google toolbar and search      behavior more then ever.</p>
<h3>Google Search Data Red Flags</h3>
</li>
<li>Lack of repeat visits</li>
<li>Short visits &#8211; Visitors search keyword, click on your result, and leave your    site immediately.</li>
<li>Your site not getting bookmarked</li>
<p>So how do you get back to the top? There is no easy fix, you need to get the    right links, you need to entice people to make your site one of their favorites    and come back often, and you need to offer something unique to the Internet    community. Essentially, you need to become an authority site in your niche.    This is no easy task and requires hours of time and devotion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.linkadage.com/blog/2005/10/where-did-your-website-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

